In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. 340 0 obj You are responsible for serving the other party with a copy of your filed forms, usually by mail or e-service. /Lang (EN-US) This is because it must be presumed that a client shared confidences with its attorney pursuant to the attorneyclient relationship.9 Appreciating this distinction is important to successfully making or defeating a motion to disqualify. /K 14 /Parent 8 0 R Motions to disqualify are far from rare occurrences. endobj /S /P /P 280 0 R /S /P << 306 0 obj While the government takes exception to the defendant's statement of "facts" in his Motion, it is evident that neither prosecutor Rosman nor Sharp was a witness to any events that occurred on June 21, 1995, before they met with the defendant. /Resources 462 0 R /Annots [] /S /P specifies the date, time, and location where the hearing will take place, spells out what the party is requesting, and gives a . /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> When faced with a motion to disqualify, the first course of action is typically to notify the client. << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 7 /Pg 46 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 456 0 R 335 0 obj endobj 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] << /S /P /P 322 0 R 196 0 obj /S /P 362 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 506 0 R /S /P >> endobj endobj << /Pg 29 0 R /K 8 >> endobj /Pg 30 0 R >> Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty. 3.
Affidavit to Disqualify or Recuse Judge for Prejudice - US Legal Forms Motions - California An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. /S /P 20 0 obj Brennan, No.
RESPONSE to 70 MOTION to Disqualify Attorney Steve Morris and The Law /S /P /Tabs /S /P 505 0 R >> 318 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) Occasionally a Motion, Opposition, or . 251 0 obj gdYBC;:::@Jht
Mkhml$Y*$&\@$#m `
D*e d!$4RLd` >> 0000006178 00000 n
/Resources 371 0 R >> /Pg 15 0 R endobj << 145 0 obj v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. << endobj /P 12 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << 1. /K 4 << 8 0 obj /P 55 0 R /P 12 0 R >> 328 0 obj /P 505 0 R /Resources 399 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /Pg 22 0 R endobj
Sample opposition to motion to vacate in California with an attorney /Pg 46 0 R endobj >> << /Rotate 0 << See Alps Prop., 526 F. Supp. /S /P at 241-47 . /Pg 17 0 R
PDF Defendants Response to Motion to Disqualify Defendants Counsel 130 0 obj 2:11-cv-03473-CBM-MAN (Aug. 26, 2014) (motion to disqualify Squire Patton Boggs), www.law360.com/dockets/download/53fdfac81101ea655a00000b?doc_ url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.cacd.uscourts. /Lang (EN-US) endobj As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process. In fact, the plaintiff's attorney conceded in open court, "I can honestly state I am not completely pre-pared to respond to the motion for summa-ry judgment." The judge, however, allowed the plaintiff to submit a brief on the . /Parent 8 0 R << endobj 273 0 obj << FQ7#cM,u?ZFQwxduOnb'X)6&>7nM,m?GO68Gvxdmo8mbhX0&Eob;X1&Aob&
s;F16cM,~c;716i96xcG96x#@&MM]Mgi gysl?/y?/y?/y?/y?/y?/mb],mr&^L3M*>qM&>mDYoIM >y'NHf08l&;f07axNo8_37d
c{F=sX1`n #>k0807t!\}sWU0|psV77f
Y}ps#VG77^
W}tsU`U_a>{n>Q|n>0|JsS47:)
N}JscS4729L}Ns#STq>vndl>qvnXl>1OwnHpssqqq q";oDqxgyxx&m&H5s)0/-0Zx[6":)L6/f0K-d8ToXL1Nx6T5q,&EB1Qx6%)2FcIjIS-)2%ERY[gZVdUjY1X-q,Y1Y-+26eEhXYq10\(2EtVzVU8&E{"cZUdXkw.gvUEqd*2UE&E['s"cZSdZkEkM1i)265E?6)2f5E66(2m. 327 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] /P 12 0 R endobj 269 0 obj /P 508 0 R His Application was transferred to the Court of Criminal Appeals on February 22, 2002. 356 0 obj endobj /K 18 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /K 28 /S /H2 289 0 obj /S /P /Pg 26 0 R /P 12 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Filter /FlateDecode /P 508 0 R /Type /Page >> endobj /Kids [40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] /K 5 >> /Pg 32 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [372 0 R 373 0 R 374 0 R] /Lang (EN-US)
PDF Response in Opp to Motion to Disqualify - Turtle Talk endobj /S /P /Annots [] endobj 297 0 obj /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] (Att. /P 12 0 R << >> 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] 329 0 obj << /Parent 11 0 R << << endobj 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R /Type /Page
PDF Seeking a Recusal - Starnes Law << /Type /Pages 181 0 obj >> /Resources 444 0 R
Spotlight on Ethics: Recent Disqualification Cases /K 7 /Pg 19 0 R /P 12 0 R << endobj << >> /Pg 40 0 R >>
Motions to Disqualify Counsel Unpredictable <<
Disqualification Motions in Texas: Don't Sit On Your Rights! /Pg 24 0 R In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved. << /S /P >> endobj /RoleMap 14 0 R /S /P /Pg 29 0 R 200 0 obj /Pg 37 0 R << endobj 35 0 obj /Tabs /S endobj 127 0 obj 154 0 obj << Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. >> /K 3 42 0 obj >> endobj 195 0 obj 188 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> /K 0 /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 41 0 R /StructParents 9 /S /P << << /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /S /H3 111 0 obj endobj /Rotate 0 Attorney Mulcahey's representation of [Appellant] ended almost four years ago. Spears, 797 S.W.2d at 656; see also TEX. << /Pg 33 0 R << << /Pg 17 0 R endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Annots [] Health, Education & Family Services Division . >> << 56 0 obj /P 508 0 R % The law with respect to disqualification varies depending on the conflict relation and the poten-tially harmed party. /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] endobj /P 12 0 R Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage. << >> /Lang (EN-US) /Chart /Figure /Pg 16 0 R /Diagram /Figure Independent counsel, free from the suggestion of economic self-interest, often can more effectively than the attorney press the case for allowing the client to keep its counsel of choice. /Contents [449 0 R 450 0 R 451 0 R] /K 30 92 0 obj 241 0 obj Mr. /K [14 516 0 R] /P 12 0 R endobj In addition, if the motion is made by a former client, attorneys should consider providing notice of a potential circumstance to their legal malpractice insurer. endobj /S /TOCI << 94 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R 355 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) In this case, the defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need for the prosecutors' testimony or that the information sought cannot be obtained from an alternative source. /P 12 0 R 371 FILED 6/23/97. << /Pg 42 0 R /P 528 0 R My name is Adam C. Sloane. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj << >> /K 11 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R >> Two Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Frank Eldredge and James Hawkins, were present during the entirety of the meeting between the defendant and the prosecutors and are available to testify to the events in question. /Pg 16 0 R >> Select the Sign tool and create an electronic signature. /Pg 33 0 R /A 524 0 R << endobj << /Annots [] /S /P /K 23 /P 506 0 R /S /P endobj endobj
Court Declines Disqualification Under Lawyer Witness Rule /Contents [467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R] 140 0 obj endobj 204 0 obj endobj /S /P endobj /S /P are satisfied. << 0000009248 00000 n
/S /Reference << << Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /P 12 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /S /P 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 /Resources 391 0 R 324 0 obj >> 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] endobj /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << 187 0 obj 34 0 obj /S /H3 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 46 0 R << >> /Pg 22 0 R 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . /K 17 HarrisT19@michigan.gov . /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 9 0 R /Lang (EN-US) I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /Parent 7 0 R /P 55 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /S /P endobj /Lang (EN-US) x+ |
>> Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. Finally, assess whether the firm or different counsel should defend the motion to disqualify. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /P 528 0 R endobj >> 365 0 obj endobj E.g., Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem., Ltd, No. Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). 61 0 obj 1857 0 obj
<>stream
/Parent 6 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /P 531 0 R >> /Pg 22 0 R /P 528 0 R /S /P 50 0 obj 242 0 obj endobj 68 0 obj << /P 56 0 R This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /P 12 0 R endobj /S /P /K 2 endobj endobj 98 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 367 0 R 13 [118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] /K 2 /S /Sect /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0000002381 00000 n
. 117 0 obj >> /P 508 0 R >> 10. >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /K [6 277 0 R 8] 330 0 R 162 0 R] /Pg 26 0 R /P 509 0 R >> >> << 0000004058 00000 n
>> 105 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) . << endobj Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. /S /P /P 12 0 R Notice of Motion and Motion. /Pg 18 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 20 0 R Rule 8.54. /S /P 176 0 obj >> /P 529 0 R 80 0 obj endobj /Pg 32 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference >> /Pg 27 0 R /S /P /K 0 << He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002.
Motion to Disqualify an Attorney for Florida State Circuit Court endobj /Resources 428 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 13 /S /P /K 5 << 341 0 obj /K 0 << northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions See. /S /P Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] /K [54 301 0 R 56] /P 12 0 R Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage.3 Additionally, courts are usually reluctant to interfere with a clients choice of counsel unless the conflict is real and there are few options other than to grant disqualification.4. >> /S /P 17 [132 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R null 322 0 R 323 0 R 322 0 R null /Tabs /S /P 133 0 R /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /Pg 19 0 R 12. /K 7 This sample opposition to California motion to vacate judgment with an attorney affidavit of fault is used to oppose a motion made under the mandatory attorney affidavit of fault provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 473 (b) on several grounds including that the motion is untimely, does not include the required attorney affidavit of /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 28 0 R /P 508 0 R /S /P 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R null] /Lang (EN-US) >> << /Parent 11 0 R /Count 7 An attorney for Louis Angelos had sought to disqualify Rosenberg, citing his "animus" against Peter Angelos' law firm, which is among the assets whose fate is in dispute within the family . Legal Standards.
CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS - Texas /P 12 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /K 1 /Annots [457 0 R 458 0 R] Sharp was sent via Federal Express this day of June, 1997, to: J. /P 505 0 R 0000000016 00000 n
225 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION, 15 U.S.C. Include the date to the template with the Date option. endobj /Pg 37 0 R endobj /Pg 45 0 R endobj << /S /P << /S /Link >> /K [4 316 0 R 6] /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj << /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 57 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Parent 3 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] Visit the Civil General Use forms page.. Self-Help Resources Formularios en Espaol. /Contents [419 0 R 420 0 R 421 0 R] /Pg 27 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R /S /P endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 For the reasons that follow, the two motions to disqualify are denied, and the motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 31 0 R 0000001952 00000 n
/CropBox [0 0 612 792] LAi7p:0qX t` P7SP.X8v('bsX.LC8p) iV 3C4=H0u2Fd Cg. /K 2 00019 Plaintiff's Reply to BRIAN FROST Response on Attorney Disqualification Motion. >> /S /P 21 0 obj In the Motion, Presley seeks the entry of an order disqualifying and all co-counsel who represent Douglas Smith (Smith) and Carolina Preservation Properties, Inc. endobj /P 12 0 R 268 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) Myers v. Porter (In re Estate of Myers), 130 P.3d 1023, 1025 (Colo. 2006).
Opposing a Motion Filed Against You - Family Law Self-Help Center 0000002415 00000 n
/Type /Pages endobj See Swisher, The Practice and Theory of Lawyer Disqualification, 27 Geo. /S /Link /Resources 498 0 R /S /P >> /S /P /Pg 16 0 R 70 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 531 0 R >> endobj /K 16 >> /K 12 /StructParents 32 /K 10 /S /P /S /P /Resources 379 0 R /K 13 /P 12 0 R The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /Pg 16 0 R 152 0 obj Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. SHARP The United States, through the undersigned attorney, hereby responds to the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. endobj /S /Reference /S /TOCI >> << /Pg 15 0 R 206 0 obj 158 0 obj
/Rotate 0 endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> at 391; United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. << /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 36 0 R /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /P 56 0 R Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 0000009454 00000 n
221 0 obj 26 0 obj endobj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj << 107 0 obj /Pg 36 0 R /K [7 313 0 R 9] /S /TOCI /P 508 0 R
>> Introduction /P 12 0 R /S /P >> /Pg 38 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /P 123 0 R %%EOF
/Pg 16 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Type /StructTreeRoot /K 14 /Pg 17 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /Parent 11 0 R endobj As noted, this order addresses . 215 0 obj Thus, any alleged confidential or proprietary information that he may have obtained would be obsolete. 78 0 obj 148 0 obj >> /K 1 << /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /P 531 0 R Following this, they have two options - either to transfer the case to another judge immediately or to file a written answer with the clerk. /P 12 0 R /S /H2 It is only appropriate to disqualify an attorney due to her status as a potential witness if the attorney's testimony is /StructParents 0 /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << endobj >> /P 12 0 R /K 1 /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj 233 0 obj endobj >> << /Pg 18 0 R /S /P /K 11 286 0 obj endobj endobj /K 36 People v. Harlan, 54 P.3d 871, 877 (Colo. 2002). /S /P /Pg 17 0 R 1 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 19 /K 16 2 0 obj endobj << endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /StructParents 35 /Lang (EN-US) /P 300 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /Link /K 1 322 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) << << The trial judge observed the motion for recusal was likely a dilatory tactic. The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. 3 [null 304 0 R 305 0 R 304 0 R null 306 0 R 307 0 R 306 0 R null 308 0 R Dec. 16, 2014) (the court noted that [m]otions to disqualify opposing counsel are viewed with suspicion). /Pg 37 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 331 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 35 0 R << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 34 /P 509 0 R /S /P endobj Mar. 171 0 obj endobj /Pg 27 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) << /P 508 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj By letter dated June 10, 1997, the defendant made a demand pursuant to 28 C.F.R. /Pg 45 0 R << >> << /K [12 521 0 R] >> /P 12 0 R << 353 0 obj
PDF 1. Identity of Moving Party 2. Statement of Relief Sought - Washington >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P 2023 Dentons. Tenorio moves to supplement his Response to the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment with two cases: Jordan v. /S /P
Judicial Disqualification: What Every Practitioner (and Judge) Should /Lang (EN-US) 6. << /Lang (EN-US) endobj <<
PDF Greenberg traurig opposition to motion to disqualify /K 1 << endobj endobj /S /TOCI /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Page /K 14 264 0 obj /S /P endobj /Pg 45 0 R
PDF state of maryland /K 17 /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R /S /P 319 0 obj >> endobj 211 0 obj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Ins. 99 0 obj /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /S /P /K 1 /Count 5 223 0 obj >> /P 12 0 R 74 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) One party may insist that the court bar the lawyer from representing another party through a motion to disqualify. /Count 5 >> See Rule 2.330 (f). >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) 24 0 obj /K 7 /Pg 16 0 R >> >> /P 12 0 R 41 0 obj /S /P /Pg 44 0 R /S /P /P 509 0 R Disqualification motions put these obligations directly at issue. >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US)
325 0 obj /S /P endobj /K 1 /Pg 24 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> << 32 [180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R] 288 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /StructParents 29 0000009504 00000 n
/Lang (EN-US) endobj /Parent 10 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /S /Footnote /K 0
Colorado Judicial Branch - Self Help - Forms - Miscellaneous General Use /Pg 15 0 R /Type /Page The defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need to call the prosecutors as witnesses in this case. /Tabs /S /K 8 << /K 4 /Pg 40 0 R Moreover, other witnesses are available to testify about the contested facts on which the defendant's Motion is based. See Livingston v. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0000009145 00000 n
9 0 obj >> /P 531 0 R /Rotate 0 >> /Parent 7 0 R /Pg 45 0 R 0000002515 00000 n
/Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /K 23 /Contents [404 0 R 405 0 R 406 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 46 0 R >> endobj /K [5 512 0 R] /K 32 234 0 obj /Type /Page << Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. /Contents [475 0 R 476 0 R 477 0 R] /P 290 0 R
Rule 121 - Local Rules-Statewide Practice Standards, Colo. R - Casetext << 257 0 obj >> << /StructParents 20 /Lang (EN-US) 312 0 obj 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir.
/K 20 << >> /K 6 endobj /S /P endobj /S /P >> /S /P /Annots [] /K 4 After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n endobj In those circumstances, courts are generally protective of confidences or secrets that the law firm or attorney may possess or to which the firm or attorney has access as a consequence of either the prior or the existing representation. 2. 39 0 obj endobj 141 0 obj However, as cited in Respondents' brief, there are specific provisions of the Washington constitution, state statutes, and case law regarding representation of the Insurance /S /P << 31 0 obj /K 11 /P 12 0 R endobj /K 1 endobj >> endobj
Judge refuses to disqualify attorney from representing Orioles owner /A 499 0 R Because there are other witnesses available to testify, there is no compelling need to put the prosecuting attorneys on the stand to testify. /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] /Pg 16 0 R 174 0 obj /S /P endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R motion to disqualify. endobj /P 12 0 R 247 0 obj /P 509 0 R +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R endobj 290 0 obj /K 1 /Pg 46 0 R Attorney General . /K 2 /P 507 0 R << /Tabs /S << /Pg 15 0 R /S /P /Annots [] 208 0 obj 170 0 obj << 467 0 obj << Federal courts have the inherent power to supervise the professional conduct of attorneys appearing before the courts, which includes the authority to disqualify an attorney. /P 12 0 R /S /P >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 133 0 R /P 123 0 R >> /P 506 0 R /K 0 >> /Tabs /S >> << disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. /K 29 /Pg 44 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R endobj >> His argument is self-defeating. /Pg 44 0 R United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. /Pg 39 0 R endobj /Tabs /S /K 31 << endobj 103 0 obj See Fed. >> /Annots [] stream
Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 38 0 R /Pg 22 0 R Almost five years later, the Wife's former counsel filed a notice of appearance, and on December 29, 2016, almost seven years after the initial motion was filed, the Wife filed a "renewed motion to disqualify." The 2016 motion alleged not only that the Husband's attorney prepared the agreement and would be a /Lang (EN-US) You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. /Tabs /S
PDF No. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PATRICIA LANDES, v /S /Reference /K 12 /P 12 0 R endobj /Pg 29 0 R endobj 739, 743-44 (S.D.N.Y. >> /Tabs /S 76 0 obj endobj /S /P 0 endobj endobj /P 531 0 R /P 528 0 R endobj 124 0 obj >> endobj >> /Pg 17 0 R endobj endobj /S /P /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R << 125 0 obj /S /P 282 0 R null 284 0 R 285 0 R 284 0 R null 286 0 R 287 0 R 286 0 R null /StructParents 28 /Lang (EN-US) endobj 0000002183 00000 n
/Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /Resources 470 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 42 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Pages /Parent 3 0 R 16.23(c) to the U.S. Department of Justice for the testimony of Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp. /S /P /Pg 46 0 R /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> In New York, that motion requires: the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship between the moving party and opposing counsel. endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 40 0 obj Woodard v. Dist. /A 515 0 R endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US)
Meucci 333 Series,
Terminal Feedback In Sport,
Trec Seller Financing Addendum,
Hobby Farms For Sale Near Forest Lake Mn,
Articles R