nagasena view on human nature

Man A steals Man B's mangoes. There are two other major problems with experience here: (i) If experience is suffering, how could the experience of enlightenment result in liberation? There is a tradition that Nagasena brought to Thailand the first representation of the Buddha, the Emerald Buddha. God is both One and Many (the doctrine of the Trinity). thereunto belonging professing to believe in Jesus Christ, shall from henceforth But given that the Buddha made quite scathing remarks about the foolishness of speculation not based on experience, how can we talk about the nature of liberation? Value and worth will be entirely in the eye of the beholder. Moreover, we dare not overlook the Hebrew parallelism in this verse: man and woman are equally created in the image of God. Postmodernism may appear quite religiously liberal and pluralistic, but make no mistake, it has an absolutist and exclusivist core: it simply cannot tolerate an absolute God. Utilitarians, meanwhile, would answer thus: we should treat people so as to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Donec aliquet. These, in briefest outline, are some of the defining points of the Christian Theist worldview. trans-historical view of human nature, I also aim to show that human nature is a necessary condition for demonstrating that alienation does occur in capitalist society, and presumably any other society that sup presses the better parts of species-being. If an ox gores a man to death, the ox is put to death, but if a man kills his neighbors ox, the man isnt put to death; rather, he has to make restitution to his neighbor. Nobel laureate Roald Hoffmann, Cornell's Frank H.T. In both philosophical systems the question of the relationship between this somewhat abstract self and the individual one takes as oneself arises, for the transcendental and experiential self do not seem identical. Naturalism is closely associated with scientism, the notion that scientific knowledge is paradigmatic for human knowledge, and (in its more radical forms) that scientific knowledge is the only true knowledge. Our value is whatever value we ascribe to ourselves. What this suggests is that to define Nirvana in either negative or positive terms is to misunderstand it, limiting it according to our present state of ignorance. To each question Nagasena replies negatively. Wherein consists the sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell? We cannot understand the value of human beings without knowing something about our nature and our origins. Nevertheless, both worldviews are engaged in a kind of metaphysical alchemy: an attempt to derive meaning and value from ultimate meaninglessness and valuelessness.[9]. "Like a wish-fulfilling gem, it fulfills all desires, causes delight and is lustrous. elohim] and crowned him with glory and honor. On the Postmodernist view, humans have no intrinsic, objective, universal value. Alternatively, we could interpret the nothingness of Nirvana to mean an undifferentiated continuum. No doubt the terms postmodern and postmodernism have been used to describe a multitude of different movements and viewpoints. Realm of man is highest as it offers the chance of Nirvana, the god realm is too comfortable and the demi-god realm is consumed by envy with the god-realm. Although logically it must be the case that the Enlightened One is either reborn or not reborn (either continues to experience after death or does not), Buddha is here asserting that none of the four possibilities are actualized. Should Man A be punished for the crime of Man B? Xunzi on Human Nature Evil has its roots in human nature, can only . Nirvana could be that which transcends all normal human experience (and for the Buddhist must necessarily do so, since normal human existence entails suffering and is characterized by becoming). Just this: the four questions mentioned above can also be applied to usto human beings. There is no soul distinct from the body. The 'chariot' is a conventional way of referring to the entirety of what might be understood to be a chariot. Truth is not something to be discovered so much as something to be created. This is a particularly tricky question for a Postmodernist, for there are no absolute norms that could supply an objective answer. In the remainder of this essay, then, I propose to consider three prominent worldviews and the competing views of human nature that they embody and entail. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. The Quran nowhere echoes the affirmations of Genesis 1:26-27. First, in the institution of capital punishment: And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it and from man. This is based on anicca - all existence is a continual process of becoming, flux and change. Explain Nagasena's view and pay special attention to the explanation of all of this given in the text and use that information in your paper. in it. It makes no difference in the end, because Postmodernism seeks to decouple human nature from any objective historical events.[8]. There are at least two possible interpretations: (i) To assert that x is unborn is to say that it does not come into existence at a particular time because it never has a beginning, i.e., it is eternal. Everything that exists ultimately has its basis in physical entities: matter and energy. Neither King Menander nor Nagasena established the "essential nature" of "permanent identity." . [16], Secondly, we see the great value ascribed to mankind in the incarnation and the atonement. Rhodes Professor of Humane Letters Emeritus, is an atheist. This entails that there is no objective, determinate answer to questions such as What is a human being? and What does it mean to be human? We ourselves are free to define what it means to be human, whether individually or collectively. All mankind by their fall lost communion with God, are under his wrath and curse, and so made liable to all miseries in this life, to death itself, and to the pains of hell forever. If we understand Athanasiuss aphorism along orthodox biblical lines, I believe we can understand why Christianity ascribes a dignity and value to human nature that Judaism simply cannot. "The element of nibbana does exist, O king, and he who practises rightly and who rightly comprehends the formations [which give rise to the egoistic self that is bound to samsara according to the teachings of the Conqueror [i.e., the Buddha], he, by his wisdom, realises nibbana. Nothing has an intrinsic and objective value, simply in virtue of what it is. First Baby Born Using Three-Parent Technology. And to him who sees the terror of the treadmill of life [i.e., samsara, or the samsaric experience of life] the thought arises, 'On fire and blazing is this wheel of life, full of suffering and despair. It arises out of the choices and preferences of human societies. If we define Nirvana in negative terms, as annihilation, extinction or nothingness, then since true nothingness plausibly implies that nobody experiences it, the Buddhists could plausibly assert the compatibility of no-self with this concept of liberation. The typical answer given, however, is that we should treat others with pluralistic tolerance and without judgment. It cant be true. And thus, through our union with Christ by faith, we are conformed to the divine image and brought into the divine life in a way that Adam never experienced. What Judaism lacks, compared with Christianity, is a doctrine of redemption through divine incarnation and atonement. Nam risus ante, dapibus a molestie consequat, ultrices ac magna. However, the truth of the conclusion depends on premise 3. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. ", "You say, Nagasena, that nibbana is neither past, nor present nor future, neither arisen, nor not arisen, nor producible. "human nature" is good or bad begins to gain some scientifically as sessable content.5 3. In contrast, the Quran and subsequent Islamic tradition stress the absolute transcendence of God: Allah cannot be compared to anything in the creation.[18]. This puts Naturalists in something of a predicament, because it is widely recognized that science cannot deliver value judgments. Step-by-step explanation EXPLAIN NAGASENA VIEW ON HUMAN NATURE Nagasena takes a very subjective position. Not all milk turns to curd, then butter, and then ghee, and whilst the milk is still milk surely it still has the identity of milk? The main burden of the following discussion will be to argue that in the end only one of these worldviewsChristian Theismcan supply any firm basis for human dignity and human rights. However, what Buddha meant by his assertions about the unborn in Udana 8.3 is unclear. Consequently, what we call human natureif we can meaningfully speak of human nature at allwill be relative, fluid, and ultimately up for grabs. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. It follows that if the self performed the executive function, it could perform that function on other parts of the person, but not on itself. . Summary - John Locke On Identity and Diversity, Summary - David Hume 'Of Personal Identity', 2020 VCE Further Mathematics Exam Flashcards, VCE Health & Human Development Exam Flashcards, 2020 VCE Physical Education Exam Flashcards, Byron Almen, Dorothy Payne, Stefan Kostka, The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric, Lawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses, John Lund, Paul S. Vickery, P. Scott Corbett, Todd Pfannestiel, Volker Janssen. You have set your glory above the heavens When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have set in place, what is man that you are mindful of him, and the son of man that you care for him? Fusce dui lectus, congue vipiscing elit. Nagasena then scrutinises Milindas claim that he arrived by chariot in the same terms, asking whether chariot refers to the axle, pole, seat etc., or whether chariot refers simply to the unity of these parts. Neutral karma is attached to actions such as breathing which will have no long-term costs or benefits. Let us consider Naturalism as a worldview, under the four headings previously stated. As for knowledge, there is no such thing as knowledge in the classical sense (roughly, a well-grounded or well-justified belief that reflects an objective reality). A series of dialogues between King Milinda and Nagasena, the Buddhist scholar. As someone once quipped, trying to define postmodernism is like trying to nail Jell-O to the wall. Unlike Islam, Judaism acknowledges the doctrine of the imago Dei, sharing with Christianity a commitment to the creation account in the Torah. We see this illustrated in Scripture in at least two ways. Naturalists will typically affirm that there is such a thing as objective truth. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. Therefore, whatever has value, has value because (and only because) of its relationship to God. In that case does the man who realises nibbana realise something already produced, or does he himself produce it first and then realise it? For the Naturalist, all evolutionary processes are entirely natural and therefore undirected. As fearful and terrifying should you regard the anxiety which arises again and again on account of birth, old age, disease and death; as filth should you regard gain, honours and fame; as hot and searing should you regard the three-fold fire of lust, hatred and delusion. God is a supernatural being and therefore God does not exist. Before his enlightenment, he was a noble person called Siddhartha . Thomas Hobbes Views On Human Nature 392 Words | 2 Pages. essay philosophy. I am convinced that there can be no resolution of these issues while people hold such radically divergent views of human nature, situated in such diametrically opposed worldviews. So, could there be something outside the skandhas that constitutes the self? In modern times, this concept is similar to the idea of "anarchy.". Buddha himself said little about the state of beings who attain liberation, or what happens to them after death. The doctrine of 'not-self' - the illusion of a self has unfavourable moral consequences and leads to unhappiness. A broader problem is that of determining which ostensibly fundamental . religion nor in free exercise thereof within this province or the islands thereunto I would have to say that the chariot is an appropriate simile to the human self. The introduction sets the scene for the dialogue and establishes Milinda as a king with an enquiring mind and Nagasena as a sage and scholar with supernatural powers - their views deserve to be listened to. Naturalism, by definition, rejects the idea of any transcendent supernatural cause, from which it follows that the universe is either eternal or came into existence spontaneously without any prior cause (both positions are defended by Naturalists today). "Like a mountain peak, it is very high, immoveable, inaccessible to the defilements, it has no place where defilements can grow, and it is without favouritism or prejudice. On the Postmodernist view, what is real and what is true are ultimately defined by us. On the one hand, the traditional "standard account" of human nature claims that we something which other animals have lack (namely, rationality). Nothing exists independently of God in the slightest respect. underlying and illuminating common human experience. Pellentesque dapibus efficitur laoreet. More modern statues often show a bald, elderly monk scratching his ear with a stick to symbolize purification of the sense of hearing. At a deeper level, however, these two worldviews must be regarded as close siblings; indeed, as non-identical twins conceived in the same womb. His traditional textile depiction shows him holding a khakkhara in his right hand and a vase in his left; an excellent example can be seen on one of the thangkas in the Cleveland Museum of Art collection. (ii) A central cause of suffering, according to Buddhism, is psychological attachment to the self. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. In reality, these divisions and debates will never be resolved without real gospel transformation. [7] Here I propose to use the term simply as a covering label for various philosophies that share some common themes. A fairly standard definition would be as follows: something is natural if and only if it can be studied and explained, at least in principle, by the so-called natural or empirical sciences (i.e., physics, chemistry, and biology). Even if we discover that the Nirvana/no-self combination lacks cogency, does it follow that the theory of no-self is no longer valuable for that theory supports the doctrine of non-attachment, which grounds the Buddhist ethic of universal compassion? Furthermore, there are multiple anthropologies competing within our culture today, which leads to polarized positions on these ethical debates. But anthropologies dont come into existence ex nihilo. The show first aired in the United States in 1997, yetlike so many other great ideasAmerica stole it from Britain, where it has been broadcast regularly since 1979. be any way troubled, molested or discountenanced for or in respect of his or her What it means to be human, for Wittgenstein, is our ability to think consciously. On this view, Naturalism turns out to be some version of physicalism. The Story of Nagasena and the Chariot shows Buddhists that there is no such thing as the self (anatta). Simple: we are whatever we define ourselves to be. What is the nature of the self that Buddhists deny, and how can they justify this claim? This leads us again to ask: how can the concept of liberation remain coherent unless we can identify one who is liberated? There is no transcendent personal Creator who exists objectively and absolutely. There are no absolute standards over us, to which we are all subjectand that includes moral standards. ", "No there is not, yet it does exist. Wouldnt this be a refutation of its actual nothingness? In his opinion, human nature is made up of three parts: the first two are impulses to do or not do anything, and the third is the intelligence that determines which direction to go. belonging nor any way compelled to the belief or exercise of any other Religion 18. Although this is a common objection to Buddhism, to consider its validity we must explore the concept of Nirvana more fully in order to understand the liberation it offers. As one Naturalist philosopher, Alex Rosenberg, succinctly put it: The physical facts fix all the facts.[2], Within the Naturalist camp we may also distinguish between hard and soft Naturalists. His view on human nature is that it's composed of three parts: the first two are impulses to either do or not do something, and the third part is the intelligence that decides which View the full answer Previous question Next question Donec aliquet. This is the source of delusion and cause of great suffering - search for permanence in impermanence. Fusce dui lectus, congue vel laoreet ac, dictum vitae odio. Alvin Plantinga, On Christian Scholarship, in. As the creation account in Genesis plainly affirms (and as scientific knowledge increasingly confirms) there is a clear ontological boundary between mankind and other animals, rather than an evolutionary continuum. A similar depiction can be seen in the collection of Singapore's Asian Civilisations Museum (Qianlong era, 18C: tangka with silk appliqu.)[4]. Rather, this definition of Nirvana forces the conclusion that Buddhism is essentially nihilistic which Buddhists would deny. Everything other than God exists only because of God. Yet as radically other from anything we experience, Nirvana is in a category of its own. Exclusivity is out! Other personalities mentioned in the text are Ngasena's father Souttara, his teachers Rohana, Assagutta of Vattaniya and another teacher named yupla from Sankheyya near Sgala. In short, something is true because we have decided that it is true, either individually or collectively. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Christ is the archetypal humanthe final Adamthe true Adam. In terms of academic influence, Naturalism is most dominant in the sciences, whereas Postmodernism tends to hold sway in the humanities. Alternatively, if we discover that Buddhists can hold the two claims simultaneously without contradiction, this in itself neither shows that the no-self doctrine is actually true, nor that the lay person would be compelled to accept that the self is an illusion. True, we cannot discover the self in the five skandhas, precisely because the self is that which is beyond or distinct from the five skandhas. Unlike Christianity, Islam offers no doctrine of the imago Dei. "As a lotus is unwetted by water, nibbana is unsullied by the defilements. This liberation from continual rebirth and suffering is the result of enlightenment, which occurs when our ignorance about the nature of existence and the false belief in a self is eradicated. Thats it.[3]. More controversially, he argues that the Buddha too thought there must be some self beyond the five skandhas. This is accompanied, however, by an antithetical . This exhaustiveness claim amounts to asserting that every element or aspect of a person is accounted for by the five skandhas. The essence of Postmodernism, as I envisage it here, may be expressed in this proposition: there are no absolute norms and there is no objective reality. Legal. Certainly we must treat our fellow humans as having immeasurably more value than animals (never mind plants). the Unity of the Godhead shall be punished with death and confiscation or Milk turns to curds, then butter, then ghee. In a dialogue with his disciple Vaccha, Buddha says of the Enlightened One: to say that he is reborn would not fit the case to say that he is not reborn would not fit the case to say that he is both reborn and not reborn would not fit the case to say that he is neither reborn nor not reborn would not fit the case (A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, p.290). As Nagasena establishes with the chariot analogy, we do not have a "permanent individuality." . Bad actions will bring about misery. Your worth is what you are worth to me. Fusce, icitur laoreet. To be clear, my point is not that Islam reflects a low view of human beings. Some readers might be asking at this point, What is distinctively Christian about any of this? Successive dharmas have this relationship with each other. A God is good, of course, but God is not merely good. The idea of permanence is closely related to that of numerical identity. 7 Q Who states that the state 'is a capitalist tool and must be destroyed by revolution'? As the Westminster Larger Catechism summarizes the matter: God is a Spirit, in and of himself infinite in being, glory, blessedness, and perfection; all-sufficient, eternal, unchangeable, incomprehensible, everywhere present, almighty, knowing all things, most wise, most holy, most just, most merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Third, for these "mainstream" Confucians, the sense of a common humanity is in turn based on an intuition of a common human nature in which the human biological nature is always taken into account. (As Marvin Minsky, the MIT professor and pioneer of artificial intelligence put it, humans are essentially meat machines.) Postmodernism, on the other hand, ascribes to us virtually God-like power and authority. in the West with their fragmented and partial views on human nature has not led the Western society to a better understanding on the homo sapiens (Langgulung, 1995). Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image. (Gen. 9:5-6), This point is underscored in the Mosaic Law by the different penalties assigned for human death and animal death. ', "Therewith his mind leaps forward into the state where there is no becoming. The universe just is what it is! One thinks here of Van Tils vivid analogy of a man made of water trying to raise himself out of an infinite expanse of water by building a ladder of water. During this interrogation Milindas view of the self as a convenient designator or conceptual fiction is transformed from the idea of it being a mere empty sound into his understanding that the term chariot or Nagasena or any other composite entity is but a way of counting, term, appellation, convenient designation, mere name He acknowledges that the belief is conventionally true, but of persons in the absolute sense there is no ego to be found (Radhakrishnan & Moore, A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy, p.284). For Hindus human nature consists of a body and a soul (atman) that at death is reincarnated. Gender identity. For a strict, consistent Naturalist, this is a question without an answer. The identity of the chariot may be contingent on core parts that, if any are removed, it becomes a lesser degree of chariot. The topic of this lecture is anthropology: the study of mankind. First, I will show that Marx held What is Anthony Crosland's view on human nature? The argument from impermanence relies on the exhaustiveness claim, whose validity is implicit in the premises of the argument. (Note the contrast here with Naturalism, which typically holds to the objectivity of truth.) Each of the points of the Christian worldview I lay out below is either explicitly stated, implied, or taken for granted by the biblical authors. Dhamma, also called Dharma, refers to the Buddha's teachings. Book: Six Ways of Being Religious (Cannon), { "10.01:_Nagasena_Replies_to_the_Questions_of_King_Milinda" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.02:_Anselm\'s_Faith_Seeking_Understanding" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.03:_Chapter_Summary" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.04:_Study_Questions_on_Similarities_and_Differences" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.05:_For_Further_Reading" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10.06:_Notes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_General_Introduction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Thinking_Generically_about_Religion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Different_Ways_of_Being_Religious" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_The_Ways_of_Being_Religious_Exemplified" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Variations_in_Quality_of_Practice_of_the_Ways" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Using_the_Framework" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Applysing_the_Framework_to_the_Whole_of_Buddhism" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Applying_the_Framework_to_the_Whole_of_Christianity" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_The_Way_of_Mystical_Quest" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_The_Way_of_Reasoned_Inquiry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_The_Way_of_Right_Action" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_The_Way_of_Devotion" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_The_Way_of_Shamanic_Mediation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_The_Way_of_Sacred_Rite" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Comparing_Buddhism_and_Christianity_by__Means_of_the_Framework" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, 10.1: Nagasena Replies to the Questions of King Milinda, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbync", "authorname:dalecannon", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/facbooks/1" ], https://human.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fhuman.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FReligious_Studies%2FBook%253A_Six_Ways_of_Being_Religious_(Cannon)%2F10%253A_The_Way_of_Reasoned_Inquiry%2F10.01%253A_Nagasena_Replies_to_the_Questions_of_King_Milinda, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), 10.2: Anselm's Faith Seeking Understanding, source@https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/facbooks/1, status page at https://status.libretexts.org.